BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CARRIZO OIL AND GAS, INC., FOR AN ORDER
APPROVING UP TO FOUR HORIZONTAL WELLS WITHIN THREE APPROXIMATE 640-ACRE DRILLING
AND SPACING UNITS LOCATED IN SECTIONS 25, 26 AND 35, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 60
WEST, 6TH P.M. FOR THE NIOBRARA FORMATION, UNNAMED FIELD, WELD
COUNTY, COLORADO |
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) |
CAUSE NO. 535
ORDER NO. 535-219
DOCKET NO. 1211-AW-28 |
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION
The Commission heard this matter on November 15, 2012, at the offices of the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 1120 Lincoln Street, Denver,
Colorado, upon application for an order to approve up to four horizontal wells
within each of three approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing units established
for Sections 25, 26 and 35, Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th
P.M., for the production of oil, gas and associated hydrocarbons from the
Niobrara Formation.
FINDINGS
The Commission finds as follows:
1.
Carrizo Oil and Gas, Inc.
(“Carrizo” or “Applicant”), as applicant herein, is an interested party
in the subject matter of the above-referenced hearing.
2.
Due notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing has been given
in all respects as required by law.
3.
The Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter embraced in said
Notice, and of the parties interested therein, and jurisdiction to promulgate
the hereinafter prescribed order pursuant to the Oil and Gas Conservation Act.
4.
On September 19, 2011, the Commission entered Order No. 535-70 which,
among other things, established two approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing
units, and approved up to two horizontal wells within each unit, for the
production of oil, gas and associated hydrocarbons from the Niobrara Formation. Section 25, Township 8 North, Range
60 West, 6th P.M. is subject to this Order for the Niobrara
Formation.
5.
On October 31, 2011, the Commission entered Order No. 535-91 which, among
other things, established two approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing units,
and authorized up to two horizontal wells within each unit, for the production
of oil, gas and associated hydrocarbons from the Niobrara Formation. Sections 26 and 35, Township 8 North,
Range 60 West, 6th P.M. are subject to this Order for the Niobrara
Formation.
6.
On July 9, 2012, the Commission entered Order No. 535-188 which, among
other things, pooled all interests in an approximate 640-acre drilling and
spacing unit for the development and operation of the Niobrara Formation. Section 25, Township 8 North, Range
60 West, 6th P.M. is subject to this Order for the Niobrara
Formation.
7.
On July 9, 2012, the Commission entered Order No. 535-189 which, among
other things, pooled all interests in an approximate 640-acre drilling and
spacing unit for the development and operation of the Niobrara Formation. Section 26, Township 8 North, Range
60 West, 6th P.M. is subject to this Order for the Niobrara
Formation.
8.
On July 9, 2012, the Commission entered Order No. 535-187 which, among
other things, pooled all interests in an approximate 640-acre drilling and
spacing unit for the development and operation of the Niobrara Formation. Section 35, Township 8 North, Range
60 West, 6th P.M. is subject to this Order for the Niobrara
Formation.
9.
On September 17, 2012, Carrizo, by its attorneys, filed with the
Commission pursuant to § 34-60-116 C.R.S., a verified application
(“Application”) for an order to approve up to four horizontal wells within each
of three approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing units established for the
below-described lands (“Application Lands”), for the production of oil, gas and
associated hydrocarbons from the Niobrara Formation, with the treated interval
of the horizontal wellbore to be no closer than 600 feet from the unit
boundaries, and no closer than 600 feet from the treated interval of any other
wellbore located in the unit, without exception being granted by the Director:
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 25: All
(“DSU #1”)
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 26:
All
(“DSU #2”)
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 35:
All
(“DSU #3”)
10. On
October 31, 2012, companion protests to the Application were filed on behalf of
Diversified Operating Corporation and Foundation Energy Management LLC
(“Protestants”). Both protests
asserted that: 1) Rule 530 should be applicable to the additional wells that
Carrizo seeks to authorize in the drilling units comprised of the Application
Lands, 2) the prior force pooling order did not apply to wells for which the
information required by Rule 530 had not been supplied, 3) Carrizo had not
supplied the requisite information to the Protestants, and 4) allowing
additional wells to be drilled in the future and applying the prior force
pooling order to future wells would violate both C.R.S. §34-60-116 and
Commission Rule 530.
11. On
November 6, 2012, a Prehearing Conference was held to address the protests. Prior to the prehearing conference,
Carrizo’s attorney entered a Motion to Dismiss the companion protests on the
grounds that: 1) with respect to Sections 25 and 26 of the Application Lands,
the Protestants are not “owners” as defined by the Act and the Commission Rules
with standing to protest the modification of a drilling unit order; and 2)
pooling issues are not germane to an application to modify a drilling unit by
allowing additional wells, so that Rule 530 is inapplicable. The Motion to Dismiss further argued
that the proper procedural course for Protestants to raise issues related to the
pooling orders applicable to the Application Lands would be to file an
application to vacate or modify such pooling orders.
12. At
the prehearing conference, Carrizo’s attorney offered to resolve the matter by
providing Carrizo’s assurance that it will offer to Protestants, with respect to
the Application Lands in which one or both is an “owner,” an opportunity to
participate in any subsequent wells to be drilled in the units comprised of the
Application Lands and in any well for which Protestants were not provided with
proper notice and an opportunity to participate. Protestants acknowledged that
proper notice and an opportunity to participate were provided for the Hemberger
26-34-8-60 Well spudded July 26, 2012.
13. On
November 2, 2012, Carrizo, by its
attorneys, filed with the Commission a written request to approve the
Application based on the merits of the verified Application and the supporting
exhibits. Sworn written testimony
and exhibits were submitted in support of the Application.
14.
Land testimony and exhibits submitted in support of the Application by Craig E.
Wiest, Land Manager – Western US for Carrizo, showed that Carrizo has a right to
drill in the Application Lands.
15.
Geologic testimony and exhibits submitted in support of the Application by
Douglas Reid, Geological Manager for Carrizo, included an isopach map of the
interval from the top of the Niobrara Formation to the top of the Codell
Formation which showed the total thickness of the Niobrara Formation underlying
the Application Lands averages approximately 310 feet. A type log of the Niobrara Formation
showed resistivity and density values similar to logs from analogous wells
producing from the Niobrara Formation.
Stratigraphic cross-sections and gross thickness isopach tests showed the
Niobrara to be consistent, continuous, and underlying all the Application Lands.
16.
Engineering testimony and exhibits submitted in support of the Application by
Stephen C. Peters, Manager of Reservoir Engineering for Carrizo, showed an
estimated ultimate recovery (“EUR”) of 200 MBO and a drainage area estimated at
70-acres per well. Testimony
concluded that applying reasonable resource recovery and price projections to
the Application wells generates a positive rate of return sufficient for
economic investment.
17. The
above-referenced testimony and exhibits show that granting the Application will
allow more efficient reservoir drainage, will prevent waste, will assure a
greater ultimate recovery of hydrocarbons, and will not violate correlative
rights.
18.
Carrizo agreed to be bound by oral
order of the Commission.
19.
Based on the facts stated in the verified Application, having resolved all
protests, and based on the Hearings Officer review of the Application under Rule
511., the Commission should enter an order to approve up to four horizontal
wells within each of three approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing units
established for Sections 25, 26 and 35, Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th
P.M., for the production of oil, gas and associated hydrocarbons from the
Niobrara Formation.
ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED, that up to four horizontal wells within each of
three approximate 640-acre drilling and spacing units established for the
below-described lands, are hereby approved, for the production of oil, gas and
associated hydrocarbons from the Niobrara Formation, with the treated interval
of the horizontal wellbore to be no closer than 600 feet from the unit
boundaries, and no closer than 600 feet from the treated interval of any other
wellbore located in the unit, without exception being granted by the Director:
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 25: All
(“DSU #1”)
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 26:
All
(“DSU #2”)
Township 8 North, Range 60 West, 6th P.M.
Section 35:
All
(“DSU #3”)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
that the provisions contained in the above order shall become effective
immediately.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Commission expressly reserves its right, after
notice and hearing, to alter, amend or repeal any and/or all of the above
orders.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that under the State Administrative Procedure Act the
Commission considers this Order to be final agency action for purposes of
judicial review within 30 days after the date this Order is mailed by the
Commission.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that an application for reconsideration by the Commission
of this Order is not required prior to the filing for judicial review.
ENTERED this _____ day of
November, 2012, as of November 15, 2012.
OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
By____________________________________
Robert J. Frick, Secretary