BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF
THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE COLORADO
OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION BY
KINDER MORGAN CO2 CO LP, MONTEZUMA AND DOLORES COUNTIES, COLORADO |
)
)
)
)
) |
CAUSE NO. 1V
DOCKET NO. 1306-OV-12
ORDER NO. 1V-414 |
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER BY CONSENT
(Pursuant to Rule 522.b.(3) of the Rules and Regulations of the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 2 CCR 404-1)
FINDINGS
Well Descriptions
1.
Kinder Morgan CO2 CO LP (“Kinder Morgan”) (Operator No. 46685)
operates the wells identified in Table 1 (“Wells”) in Montezuma and Dolores
Counties.
Table
1
Well |
History |
YG # 1 |
(API No. 05-083-06697), located in the SW¼
SE¼ of Section 14, Township 37 North, Range 18 West, NM P.M., was spud on August
24, 2012, and subsequently completed.
|
YA # 6 |
(API No. 05-083-06694), located in the NE¼
SE¼ of Section 13, Township 37 North, Range 18 West, NM P.M., was spud on May
30, 2012, and subsequently completed.
|
HA # 4 |
(API No. 05-083-06693), located in NW¼ SE¼
of Section 29, Township 38 North, Range 18 West, NM P.M., was spud on August 8,
2012, and subsequently completed. |
Doe Canyon # 11 |
(API No. 05-033-06171), located in NE¼ SW¼
of Section 15, Township 40 North, Range 18 West, NM P.M., was spud on April 5,
2012, and subsequently completed. |
Alleged Violation Citations
2.
COGCC Staff conducted inspections at the Wells and found multiple alleged
permit conditions of approval and Rule violations. The dates of citation, Notice of
Alleged Violation (“NOAV”) numbers, alleged Rule violations, and alleged
violations of conditions of approval of permits cited are identified in Table 2.
Table 2
Well Name |
YG
#1 |
YA
#6 |
HA
#4 |
Doe Canyon #11 |
NOAV # |
200374896 |
200375003 |
2369024 |
2369006 |
NOAV Date |
2/11/2013 |
2/14/2013 |
2/18/2013 |
3/7/2013 |
Alleged Rule Violations |
||||
Rule 603- Drilling Operations |
|
X |
X |
|
Rule 902 – Pits |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Rule 904 – Pit Lining |
# |
# |
# |
|
Rule 906 - Spills/Releases |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Rule 907 - E & P Waste |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Rule 1002 - Site Preparation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Rule 1003-
Interim Reclamation |
|
X |
|
|
Alleged § 34-60-121(1) C.R.S. Violations by Violating Permit Conditions of
Approval |
||||
1* 48hrs notice prior to pit construction. |
X |
X |
X |
|
2* 48hrs notice prior to pit liner installation. |
X |
X |
X |
|
3* Drill cuttings properly contained. |
# |
# |
# |
|
4* Netted Pit |
# |
# |
# |
|
5* Fenced pit |
|
# |
|
|
6* Total site disturbance |
X |
X |
X |
X |
7* 110% containment of contained liquids |
X |
|
|
|
8* De minimis moisture content of
cuttings. |
# |
# |
# |
|
9* Wattle installation |
# |
# |
# |
|
X
Violation used to assess penalty
#
Duplicative of a rule violation and therefore not considered in base
fine.
1*
Submit notice 48 hours prior to pit construction via Form 42.
2*
Submit notice 48 hours prior to pit liner system installation via Form 42.
3*
All cuttings generated during drilling with high
chloride/salt based muds must be kept in the lined drilling pit, or
placed either in containers or on a lined/bermed portion of the well pad prior
to offsite disposal. The moisture content of any drill cuttings in a cuttings
pit, trench, or pile shall be as low as practicable to prevent accumulation of
liquids greater than de minimis amounts.
4*
The pit must be netted. The operator must maintain the netting until the pit is
closed.
5*
The pit must be fenced. The operator must maintain the fencing until the pit is
closed.
6*
Total disturbed area is limited to that authorized in the approved Form
2A.
7*
Operator must ensure 110 percent secondary containment for any volume of
fluids contained at well site during drilling and completion operations;
including, but not limited to, construction of a berm or diversion dike,
diversion/collection trenches within and/or outside of berms/dikes, site
grading, or other comparable measures (i.e., best management practices (BMPs)
associated with stormwater management) sufficiently protective of nearby surface
water.
8*
The moisture content of any drill cuttings in a cuttings pit, trench, or
pile shall be as low as practicable to prevent accumulation of liquids greater
than de minimis amounts prior to
offsite disposal.
9*
Fiber wattles must be installed as required by the conditions of approval
of the approved permit.
Cited Rules Summary
3.
Rule Violations cited in Table 2 are explained as follows:
a.
Rule 603.j., provides that all locations, including wells and surface
production facilities, shall be kept free of the following: equipment, vehicles,
and supplies not necessary for use on that lease; weeds; rubbish, and other
waste material.
b.
Rule 902 requires that pits be constructed and operated to protect public
health, safety, welfare, and the environment, including wildlife resources. Rule 904 provides that pit lining
systems be designed, constructed, installed and maintained in accordance with
manufacturer’s specifications and good engineering practices. Fence posts on the top of the berms
were driven through the liner. The liner was folded and wrinkled.
c.
Rule 906 requires that spills/releases of Exploration and Production
(E&P) waste be controlled and contained immediately upon discovery and
investigated and cleaned up as soon as practicable. Rule 906 also requires that certain
releases be reported to the COGCC. Drill cuttings, an E&P waste, had been
stockpiled onsite and had not been contained and or immediately cleaned up. Soil staining that appeared to be
result of fluids leaching from the drill cuttings was observed onsite.
d.
Rule 907 requires that E&P waste be managed in a manner that prevents
threatened or actual adverse environmental impacts to air, water, soil or
biological resources to extent necessary to ensure compliance with Table 910-1
standards.
e.
Rule 1002.b requires that soils removed during site construction be
segregated into layers and that each layer be marked or identified. Rule 1002.c requires stockpiled soils
be protected from degradation due to contamination, compaction and wind or water
erosion. Rule 1002.f.(2) requires operators implement BMPs to control stormwater
runoff, to minimize erosion and site degradation.
f.
Rule 1003 requires that debris and waste materials including but not
limited to cement, drilling additives, sand, plastic pipe and cable be removed
and all E&P waste shall be handled according to 900 series. Interim reclamation on non-cropland
is to be complete within 6 months.
Calculation of Fine
4.
Rule 523 (Procedure for Assessing Fines) specifies a maximum base fine of
$1,000 for each day of violation of Rule 603, Rule 902, Rule 904, Rule 906, Rule
907, Rule 1002, Rule 1003, and each violation of a condition of permit approval
pursuant to §34-60-121(1) C.R.S. Rule 523.a.(3) specifies that “the maximum
penalty for any single violation shall not exceed $10,000 regardless of the
number of days of such violation,” unless the violation results in significant
waste of oil and gas resources, damage to correlative rights, or a significant
adverse impact on public health, safety or welfare or the environment. Staff
alleges each violation occurred for a minimum of 10 days, except for the
conditions of approval requiring 48 hours notice, which are counted as a single
day of violation. Staff is not alleging significant waste of oil and gas
resources, damage to correlative rights, or a significant adverse impact on
public health, safety or welfare or the environment.
5.
Pursuant to Rule 523, the potential base fines for cited alleged
violations identified in the NOAV’s is $ 246,000.
6.
Rule 523.d. specifies that a fine may be decreased by application of
mitigating factors including:
a.
Rule 523.d.(2) the violator demonstrated effective and prudent response
to the violation, including assistance to impacted parties.
b.
Rule 523.d.(3), the violator cooperated with the Commission, or other
agencies with respect to the violation.
c.
Rule 523.d.(6), the cost of correcting the violation reduced any economic
benefit to the violator.
No aggravating factors pursuant to
Rule 523.d apply. The Director agrees to an approximate 10.5% discount in the
penalty amount due to these three mitigating factors.
a.
Kinder Morgan payment of a $220,000 penalty. A maximum of $80,000 may be
satisfied by funding a public project pursuant to Rule 523.e.
b.
Any public project pursuant to Rule 523.e must be proposed to the
Director not later than 30 days after this order is approved by the Commission.
c.
Payment of $140,000 shall be due 30 days after the Commission approves
this Order.
d.
If a public project is approved by the Director, the remaining $80,000
shall be satisfied according to the approved public project terms.
e.
If a public project is not approved, the remaining $80,000 shall be paid
not later than 30 days after the Director’s final decision on the public project
proposal.
8.
Payment of the penalty pursuant to this AOC does not relieve Kinder
Morgan from its obligations to complete corrective actions set forth in the
NOAV’s, as may be amended or modified by COGCC Staff.
9.
Kinder Morgan agrees to the findings of this
AOC only for the purpose of expeditiously resolving the matter without a
contested hearing. Pursuant to Rule
522.b.(3), entering into this AOC by Kinder Morgan shall not be construed
as an admission of any of the alleged violations.
Kinder Morgan fully reserves its right to
contest the same in any future action or proceeding other than a proceeding to
enforce this AOC.
ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION ORDERS:
1. Kinder Morgan shall be found
in violation of the alleged violations as identified in Table 2 of this Order.
2. Kinder Morgan shall be
assessed a total penalty of $220,000 for
the Rule violations set forth above.
3.
The penalty amount may be offset by up to a maximum of $80,000 by a
Kinder Morgan contribution to a public project pursuant to Rule 523.e.
4.
Any public project pursuant to Rule 523.e must be proposed to the
Director not later than 30 days after this order is approved by the Commission.
5.
Payment of $140,000 shall be due 30 days after the Commission approves
this Order.
6.
If a public project is approved by the Director, the remaining $80,000
shall be satisfied according to the approved public project terms.
7.
If a public project is not approved, the remaining $80,000 shall be paid
not later than 30 days after the Director’s final decision on the public project
proposal.
8.
Payment of the fine pursuant to this AOC shall not relieve Kinder Morgan
from its obligations to complete remaining corrective actions set forth in the
NOAV’s, as may be amended or modified by COGCC Staff.
9. Entry of this Order
constitutes final agency action for purposes of judicial review 30 days after
the date this order is mailed by the Commission.
10. The provisions contained in the above
Order shall become effective immediately.
RECOMMENDED this 4th __ day
of June, 2013.
OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION
COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
By
Peter J. Gowen, Enforcement Officer
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this _________day of June, 2013.
KINDER MORGAN CO2 CO LP
By:
___________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Kinder
Morgan CO2 CO LP Representative
___________________________________________
Print Signatory Name
___________________________________________
Title of Signatory
============================================================================
This Administrative Order by Consent was heard by
the Commission on the 17th
day of June, 2013
and approved.
OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
By____________________________________
Robert J. Frick, Secretary